FREE MEMBERSHIP Includes » ABL Advisor eNews + iData Blasts | JOIN NOW ABLAdvisor Gray ABLAdvisor Blue
Skip Navigation LinksHome / Articles / Read Article


Second Lien Debt Opportunities in the Lower Middle Market

Date: Sep 01, 2016 @ 07:00 AM
Filed Under: Underwriting

Lower middle-market second lien debt fills a much needed capital void by providing a product that is subordinated to an ABL or senior cash flow loan and that is subject to an inter-creditor agreement and traditionally in the form of an amortizing loan with a term that ranges from 12 to 36 months. This lending product intersects where ABLs and senior cash-flow lenders fall short when it comes to providing additional availability and leverage multiples and where traditional mezzanine lenders either can’t deploy enough capital on a per deal basis or can't get comfortable with a lower level EBITDA threshold.

The lower middle-market second lien market is still in the second inning of a proverbial double header given the inherent business risks, liquidity pressures and resources needed to serve this asset class. For clarity and differentiation, lower middle-market second lien debt is typically defined by companies generating less than $5 million in EBITDA. For good reason, this is not a market targeted or served by capital providers such as institutional second lien funds and the numerous BDCs and traditional SBIC mezzanine funds.

On average, these funds typically have at least $300 million in assets under management and much larger and longer term hold limits. Large capital bases and commensurate infrastructure preclude many firms from writing a sub-$5 million check, which is the key need when providing second lien capital to the lower middle market. We have a saying at Super G that anyone can have a big fund, but very few can manage a small fund and serve the needs of the many companies in this country that don’t need or are unable to obtain subordinated capital from larger funds.

The bar is high for companies looking for traditional mezzanine capital that typically matures in three-to-five years and on average needs to be able to support $5 million + of subordinated debt. This is compared to our target second lien borrower that generates less than $5 million in EBITDA and has subordinated capital needs less than $5 million. Companies can solve large capital needs due to market efficiencies, but there is a void when it comes to solving for smaller subordinated capital needs (less than $5 million). This capital is not meant to be long term nor is it meant to be competitive to traditional mezzanine, which is long-term capital and usually accompanied by a financial sponsor.

In order to succeed in the lower middle-market second lien arena, a lender must have a unique and flexible private capital base that in turn provides flexibility to solve for lower middle-market needs. This market strategy requires filling the void where senior lenders stop and institutional mezzanine starts. At Super G, we cover numerous industries and over the years have used experience and portfolio data to drive our lending strategy and criteria. Our lending criteria and strategy vary by industry with some industries such as niche manufacturing, which is asset heavy and working capital challenged compared to software, which is asset light, and getting better terms based on the recurring revenue nature.

The opportunity to provide second lien capital remains the same, but the challenges and risks vary by industry. The following paragraphs provide our views on completing second lien transactions in three distinct verticals – niche manufacturing, consumer products and software.

Niche Manufacturing

Niche manufacturing represents the cornerstone of the American workforce and is a vital part of the economy due to the fact that many essential industries such as aerospace, automotive and consumer durable goods have vast and desegregated supply chains with many being key suppliers. From helicopter parts to refrigerator door handles, niche manufacturing continues to comprise a valuable service to large industrial companies. We see tremendous opportunity in continuing to finance niche manufacturing, but many face severe working capital pressure as they have limited terms from their suppliers and are forced to sit on more inventory by their customers all of which constrains cash. There are thousands of niche manufacturers that generate less than $50 million and $5 million in revenue and EBITDA, respectively. These are strong businesses, but they lack sufficient liquidity to manage a longer working capital cycle than ever before. Partnering with ABLs and commercial banks to provide over-advances and subordinated working capital lines to provide additional working capital beyond a borrowing base is critical from our perspective. By structuring a cash-flow loan tailored around a working capital cycle, the niche manufacturer can properly finance its needs and ensure a payback that still meets fixed charge ratios.

Consumer Products

Consumer goods, whether staples or luxury items, represent a significant portion of not only GDP, but trade finance given the supply chain (both domestic and international) necessary to meet the demands of American households. While there are oligopolies in each aisle of a supermarket (i.e. Coke and Pepsi), department stores and other channels, each consumer vertical market is large and ripe for constant innovation. On average, these companies are high gross margin sales and marketing companies that outsource all manufacturing, but still need to finance and hold inventory.  Most senior lenders take a cautious and conservative view towards lending against inventory with many even opting not to.  The combination of high growth consumer companies with large or seasonal inventory builds and lengthening cash cycles provides ample opportunity to provide second-lien capital.

Continued on Page 2...

Comments From Our Members

You must be an ABL Advisor member to post comments. Login or Join Now.